City Council Meeting: June 23,
2009
Agenda Item: 11-A
To: Mayor and City Council
From:
Subject: Amendment of Preferential
Parking Zone K
Recommended
Action
Staff recommends that City Council:
1.
Amend Zone K to change the restrictions on five blocks to: “No
vehicle shall be parked adjacent to any curb in Preferential Parking Zone K for
more than two hours between the hours of 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. daily, and no
vehicle shall be parked between the hours of 6 p.m. and 2 a.m. daily, except by
permit.” The five affected blocks are:
·
14th,
15th and 16th Streets between
·
The current restrictions on
these blocks are: “No vehicle shall be parked adjacent to any curb in
Preferential Parking Zone K for more than two hours between the hours of 9 a.m.
and 8 p.m. Monday through Saturday, except by permit.”
2.
Approve
the attached Resolution amending Preferential Parking Zone K and amending
Resolution 9344 CCS (Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Executive
Summary
Residents of four blocks in the
WilMont neighborhood have petitioned for stricter preferential parking
restrictions due to recent changes along
Background
This area is located just north of
The current preferential parking regulations
for this area, which were most recently amended by Council in 2003, state: “Two hour parking between the hours of 9 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday
through Saturday, except by permit.” The surrounding blocks in this
neighborhood have a variety of preferential parking restrictions, ranging from the
aforementioned regulations to the more stringent regulations on the 1200 block
of
Discussion
Residents of four blocks in Zone K have
submitted qualifying petitions to change their existing regulations:
·
1100
block of
·
1100 block
of
·
1400
block of
·
1500
block of
At this time, no petitions have been
submitted to implement preferential parking restrictions on the 1100 block of
Current Situation
The following map shows the current
preferential parking restrictions in the neighborhood.
Current Preferential Parking in Neighborhood
A
list of the preferential parking restrictions on adjacent streets is included
as Attachment B.
Parking
occupancy counts were conducted in the summer of 2008. The counts were conducted in the evening, as
this time was specifically identified by residents as being the worst for
parking, due in large part to the popularity of the sports bar. The counts indicate that on-street parking in
the study area is difficult to find in the evening. Average occupancies for the area range between
75 and 96 percent. Peak occupancies of
over 100% were observed on the 1100 block of
Public Outreach
Residents, businesses and others in the area
were invited to a community meeting on September 25, 2008. Twenty people attended and spoke about:
·
the
difficulties they have finding parking, especially since the creation of the
drop-off and pick-up zones along the north side of California Avenue at Lincoln
Middle School, which prohibit parking from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 2 p.m. to 4
p.m. Monday through Friday;
·
their
fear that new preferential parking restrictions on some blocks will simply move
the parking problem to neighboring streets;
·
·
the
inconsiderate and unsafe behavior of bar patrons.
Residents also raised concerns that the valet
operator for The Parlor uses their streets to park customers’ vehicles. The valet operation has been referred to the
appropriate City staff for follow up.
Some residents were concerned that changes
to the zone will make it harder for parents to park near
Complete comments are included as Attachment
D.
Survey
No consensus was reached at the community
meeting regarding the specific hours or days that restrictions should be in
effect. Subsequently, staff sent a
survey to residents to determine the best restrictions for this neighborhood. A response rate of just over 12% was
achieved. Residents were presented with three
options that restricted parking at night to residents only, while allowing for two
hour parking during the day without a permit.
The only difference between these three options was the hours of the
daytime and evening restrictions.
Additional options included “No parking anytime, except by permit,”
“Unsure,” and “Opposed to changing regulations.” A copy of the survey is included as Attachment
E.
The
following table summarizes the survey results:
|
Weekdays |
Saturdays* |
Sundays |
2
hr daytime, No parking nighttime |
44% |
38% |
36% |
No parking anytime |
26% |
32% |
30% |
Opposed to changing regulations |
26% |
27% |
29% |
Unsure |
4% |
4% |
5% |
*Does not equal 100% due to rounding.
The survey results
indicate that a plurality of the respondents
favor allowing two hour parking during the day and restricting parking to
residents only at night. Staff is
recommending the most popular of the three variations on this theme presented
to residents: Two hour parking from 9 a.m to 6 p.m. and no parking 6 p.m. to 2
a.m., except by permit.
Over a quarter of
the respondents were opposed to changing the current regulations on these
blocks. The majority of these
respondents do not live on the blocks in question and are likely concerned
about the parking problem being pushed to their streets. Staff is confident that the extra parking
capacity in the area afforded by the unregulated curb along Lincoln Middle
School will continue to prevent this situation, especially in the evenings when
the school is closed. Creating a
preferential parking zone along the frontage of Lincoln Middle School in the
evenings is not recommended because residents from nearby blocks rely on this parking,
especially in the evenings. If this area
were to become a preferential parking zone, it is conceivable that the
remaining blocks in this neighborhood would be forced to petition in order to
regain the ability to park there.
See Attachment F for full survey results.
Alternatives
The Council could choose not to modify this
zone and the current restrictions of “two hour
parking 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Saturday, except by
permit” would be retained. They could also choose different hours and
types of restrictions than are recommended in this report.
Environmental Analysis
The proposed project has been determined to be categorically
exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 (c) which was recently amended to define
Class 1 exempt projects in the following way: "Class 1 consists of the
operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor
alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical
equipment, or topographical features, involving little or no expansion of use
beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination. . ."
This exemption lists as an example of "existing facilities:"
"(c) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian
trails, and similar facilities." Preferential parking zones involve only
the issuance of permits for the use of an existing public street and include
negligible or no expansion of this existing use.
Financial Impacts &
Budget Actions
No change in revenue is anticipated as
residents on affected blocks are already eligible to purchase permits. Ordering
new signage will cost an estimated $750, which is available in account 544010 (Special
Department Supplies).
Prepared by: Jason Kligier,
Transportation Planning Assistant
Approved: |
|
Forwarded to Council: |
|
|
|
Director, Planning and
Community Development |
|
P. City Manager |
Attachments: A Resolution Establishing Preferential Parking, Exhibit A – Preferential Parking Zones
B Current
Preferential Parking Restrictions on Adjacent Streets
C Parking Occupancy Study Results
D Comments from Community Meeting