|
|
|
| Water Use |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Citywide Water Usage
1990-2006 |
|
Percentage: Local Vs Imported Water 1990-2006 |
|
Water Use:
Local Vs Imported
Water 1990-2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDICATOR |
Citywide Water Use, Percent Local vs. Imported & Potable vs. Non-potable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATUS |
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TREND |
Stable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
 |
|
|
Sustainable
water consumption means using water no more
quickly than the rate at which it is restored.
As a city, Santa Monica could be completely
sustainable if it were able to supply all of its
water needs from local well sources
indefinitely. Reducing water consumption per
capita and increasing the percentage of water
that comes from local sources are two important
steps toward sustainability.
In order to
measure progress towards the stated goals, this
indicator looks at total citywide water use, the
percent of water that is local versus the
percent imported from distant watersheds in
California and the Western United States.
Finally, it examines the amount of water that is
potable versus non-potable.
The target
for consumption is to reduce overall water use
by 20% of 2000 levels by 2010. In 2000, water
use was 13.4 million gallons per day (MGD); a
twenty percent reduction of that usage is 10.7
MGD. The city aims to increase the amount of
locally obtained potable water to its 1995 high
point of 70% of total water use by the year
2010. The city is also working to maximize
non-potable water use when appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
|
 |
|
|
Citywide Water Consumption
There was a significant drop in water use between
1990 and 1991, but water use since 2000 has hovered
around the 13.4 MGD mark, where it was in 2006.
Clearly, meeting the Indicator goal to reduce
overall water use by to 20% of the 2000 baseline (to
10.7 mm/day) by 2010 continues to be difficult,
given continued development and increasing daytime
population.
Local
vs. Imported Water
The percentage of local vs. imported water dropped
between 2005 and 2006 from 13% to 12% of total water
supply. This followed an encouraging jump from 5%
to 13% between 2004 and 2005. This percentage
change results not only from a slight decrease in
local water supply, but in an overall increase in
water usage in the city.
Potable Water Use
Santa Monica Urban Runoff & Recycling Facility (SMURRF)
produces non-potable water for use in landscape
irrigation, at city parks and cemeteries, toilet
flushing and in some city
fountains. Sales of recycled water from the SMURRF
in 2006 increased 35% over 2005, to a total of 32
million gallons per year. That represents nearly 1%
of water use. For residents and businesses to take
further advantage of this reclaimed water requires
more infrastructure than is currently
in place, but it is a hopeful sign that this number
continues to grow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIGHLIGHTS |
|
|
|
|
● The average American uses 168 gallons of water
per day. The average person in Santa Monica
uses 144 gallons of water per day.
● The City of Santa Monica operates its own
water utility. Of the 13.4 million gallons used
per day, approximately 27% is consumed by
single-family units, 44% by multi-family units,
and 28% by commercial users. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
|
Citywide Water Use
The city is taking a leadership role in encouraging
innovative strategies to meet its 20% consumption
reduction goal.
This year it has added to its list of water
efficiency programs the
"20 Gallon Challenge",
which encourages individuals to save 20 gallons of
water each day by implementing water saving
strategies for both indoor and outdoor water
use. The other ongoing programs are the Free Home
Water Assessments, Water Efficient Clothes Washer
Rebate Program, the High Efficiency Toilet Rebate
Program, and
the Gardens & Landscaping Programs.
Local vs. Imported Water
In 1995, Santa
Monica’s local groundwater wells supplied 70% of the
water used in the city. That number dropped
precipitously with the discovery of the fuel
additive, MTBE, contamination of those wells from
leaking underground storage tanks in 1996, to a low
of 5% in 2004. An agreement with the responsible oil
companies to provide for the rehabilitation was
reached in 2003. The relatively low level of local
water supply we saw this year is not surprising,
given that measures to rehabilitate the affected
wells have not yet been implemented. Those
rehabilitation programs are estimated to take
anywhere from 5-20 years, and so won't be completed
by the 2010 target date. In any event, the city’s
2006 Water Quality Report
continues to
demonstrate that levels of MTBE in remaining wells
are nil. See
Environmnetal & Public Works Management
web
site for details on the cleanup of Santa Monica's
local water supply. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT CAN WE DO TO IMPROVE? |
|
|
|
|
Ensure intra city compliance with
water regulations, while enforcing regulations for
water conservation in irrigation of residences and
businesses.
Check the
EPD website for tips on water conservation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATA SOURCES |
|
 |
|
|
View source material in Excel:
RC2_WaterUse.xls.
Email contact for data source inquires. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINTING TIPS
|
Printing tips for MS Internet Explorer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAST UPDATED
|
November 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITATION |
www.smepd.org/scpr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|