City Council Meeting: February 26,
2008
Agenda Item: 8-A
To: Mayor and City Council
From:
Subject: Annual Review of the City’s Plan for
Homeless Services and Proposed Action Plan to Address Homelessness in
Recommended
Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Hold a
public hearing on the Plan pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.69.030;
2) Receive and
approve the proposed Action Plan to Address Homelessness in Santa Monica,
including its vision statement, guiding principles and action steps; and
3) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and
execute a professional services agreement in the amount of $100,000 with GMMB
for a City-wide panhandling education campaign.
Executive
Summary
This staff report meets the
requirements of the City’s Public Safety Initiative by providing an “Annual
Review of the City’s Plan for Homeless Services” for FY 2006-07 (Attachment I);
a proposed “Action Plan for Addressing Homelessness in Santa Monica”
(Attachment II); and a summary of elements of the proposed Action Plan that are
underway (Attachment III). In addition,
the public hearing affords the public and the City Council with an opportunity
to comment on the attached documents and provide input on the impact of
homelessness in
The required Annual
Review reports on the performance of the homeless service system, detailing outcomes
for the over 2,700 homeless persons who received assistance. Programs initiated
or expanded in the prior year are summarized. In FY 2006-07 City-funded programs at the seven core
agencies served a total of 2,743 homeless individuals who self-identified as
The attached proposed Action Plan
(“Plan”) was developed in collaboration with local service providers and City
staff from the City Attorney’s Office, the City Manager’s Office, Police, Fire,
Community Maintenance, Housing and Economic Development, and Community and
Cultural Services. The Plan proposes
refinements and changes to the current service delivery system based on the FY 2006-07
Annual Review, the recommendations of the 2006 Urban Institute evaluation of
homeless services, new data, best practices, initiatives elsewhere in the
region, and the success of Santa Monica’s current initiatives. The Plan presents
a vision statement, guiding principles and specific short-, medium- and
long-term actions in the areas of social services, housing, community
education, evaluation, public policy and regional collaboration. The Plan proposes that
After receiving public comment,
City staff requests that the City Council approve the proposed Plan including
its vision statement, guiding principles and action steps. There are no immediate fiscal and budgetary
impacts resulting from this staff report.
Public education is one component of the
Plan. Therefore, City staff recommends
that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a
professional services agreement in the amount of $100,000 with GMMB for a community
education, anti-panhandling and alternative giving campaign, with the
anti-panhandling and alternative giving as the initial focus of the campaign.
GMMB was unanimously recommended based on their understanding of the unique and
sensitive aspects of the project and their experience with social marketing and
behavior change campaigns.
Funds in the amount of $100,000 were
budgeted in FY 2007-08 for this purpose.
Background
Public Safety Initiative
In 1994, the City Council
adopted the Public Safety Initiative (SMMC Sections 2.69.010 through 2.69.030)
calling for the City to adopt a plan for homeless services, based on the
following goals:
·
Effectively
assist the homeless in returning to a self-sufficient status;
·
Monitor
the progress of individual recipients;
·
Eliminate
unnecessary duplication of services;
·
Emphasize
long-term solutions to homelessness by combining housing, counseling and job
training;
·
Prevent
an increase, and wherever feasible, reduce, overall City expenditures relating
to homeless services; and
·
Impose
reasonable time limits on the provision of services to the same individuals.
The Public Safety Initiative also requires
the City Council to conduct an annual review of the City’s progress in meeting
the goals established by the Initiative, and hold a public hearing to assess:
·
The
impact of the City’s homeless population on other residents of the City;
· The changes which should be made in the Plan in order to carry out its primary goals and objectives.
Attachment I of this staff report, entitled “Annual Review of the City’s Plan for
Homeless Services,” summarizes the accomplishments and the costs of the
service delivery system for FY 2006-07 and discusses the impact of the homeless
population on the community.
Attachment II, entitled “Action Plan to Address
Homelessness in
Discussion
Annual Review – FY 2006-07 Outcomes and Accomplishments
Based on the data in
ClientTrack, City-funded programs at the seven core agencies served a total of
3,097 homeless persons, 2,743 (87%) of whom identified themselves as
In addition, the following best-practice initiatives
recommended in the Urban Institute Report were implemented or continued in FY 2006-07. Details regarding the progress and outcomes
for these initiatives can be found in Attachment I.
·
Chronic Homeless
Project (CHP)
·
Serial Inebriate
Outreach Program (SIOP)
·
·
Relocation of
Meal Program Providers to Indoor Locations
·
Project
Homecoming
·
Community
Education and Stakeholder Input
·
Increased
Supportive Housing
·
Designation of
Buildings on
·
Regional
Planning
·
Improved Data
Management
Proposed Action Plan
The attached proposed Action Plan was developed through an iterative process which gathered input from City Departments, the Chronic Homeless Project (CHP) Executive Committee and City Commissions. A series of discussions was held with Department Directors and key staff from the City Attorney’s Office, the City Manager’s Office, Police, Fire, Community Maintenance, Housing and Economic Development, and Community and Cultural Services. Concurrently, a series of facilitated discussions with the CHP Executive Committee (formed in 2004 to oversee the direction of the CHP) began in November 2007. City staff and the CHP Executive Committee reviewed and commented, over several months, on successive versions of the proposed Plan. The Social Services, Disability and Housing Commissions, the Commission for the Senior Community and the Commission on the Status of Women received presentations on the proposed Plan, as did the Bayside District Corporation Board of Directors and the Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce’s Homeless Committee. These groups will continue to advise and assist City staff and the CHP Executive Committee in implementation of the Plan, once approved by Council.
The Plan contains the following elements:
Vision Statement:
We will transform
Through collaboration and cooperation, the
City of
Guiding
Principles:
§
§
§
Vulnerable
members of
A key principle addresses the issue of
“fair share” and the capacity of
This
significant imbalance between demand and service capacity points to the need to
prioritize and target services to yield the greatest positive benefit – for
homeless persons as well as the community at large.
Action Steps: This year’s annual review gave greater attention to the
development of action steps to be taken in the coming year(s) to realize the
Action Plan’s guiding principles. These
action steps cover a broad spectrum of areas including Social Services,
Housing, Evaluation, Community Education, Public Policy and Regional Collaboration. Attachment
II describes these action steps in greater detail, and Attachment III provides
a summary of elements of the proposed Action Plan that are underway, including:
·
Develop a service
registry to identify the most vulnerable, long-term chronically homeless
individuals for prioritized services and housing;
·
Link outreach
and mental health services to the efforts of the Santa Monica Police
Department’s Homeless Liaison Program (HLP Team);
·
Align existing
bed capacity to service priority populations, starting with the bed capacity at
Samoshel;
·
Streamline
access to housing subsidies and continue to develop a range of permanent
housing options, with a focus on permanent supportive housing;
·
Develop
a proposal to Los Angeles County for health, mental health and substance abuse
treatment and supportive housing for the most vulnerable long term homeless
people identified in the service registry;
·
Participate
in a national “Hospital to Home” pilot project;
·
·
Implement a
panhandling education and alternative giving campaign which also incorporates
public education elements; and
·
Work with the
Westside Cities Council of Governments to further a regional approach on the
Westside, including setting sub-regional goals and targets beyond
Finally,
the recommendations of this report include award of funding to GMMB, a social
marketing and communications firm selected as a result of a competitive process
to lead the effort to develop a panhandling education and alternative giving
campaign in
Because of the costs
of the proposed anti-panhandling and alternative giving component of the
campaign, the initial phase of a broader community education campaign will
build on efforts using the resources of City staff. These efforts currently
include:
If desired by the City in FY 2008-09, the GMMB Scope of Services may be extended to include activities such as design, printing and distribution of marketing, advertising and collateral materials as well as implementation of alternative giving methods and broader public education regarding homelessness. The fiscal impacts associated with an increase in the scope of services will be brought to Council for consideration.
Commission Input
The Social Services and Housing Commissions, and the Commission for the Senior Community, elected to hear staff presentations on the report. The Social Services Commission and the Commission on the Status of Women have each assigned a sub-committee to review this report, once it is released in full to the public and comment at the February 26 public hearing. The Housing Commission requested a follow-up presentation from staff on the progress of the Plan.
The Bayside
District Corporation Board of Directors in its letter dates January 28, 2008
indicated that it “supports the new approach to homeless services in downtown
and encourages the City Council to adequately fund these programs.”
Financial Impacts &
Budget Actions
Reviewing this report and holding the public hearing do not have budgetary or financial impacts, however the report does provide information for consideration in the context of the City’s FY 2008-09 or subsequent years’ budget processes.
Funds in the amount of $100,000 for the city-wide panhandling education campaign are available in account 012628.555060.
Prepared by:
Stacy Rowe,
Human Services Administrator
|
Approved: |
|
Forwarded to Council: |
|
|
|
|
|
Director,
Department |
|
P. City
Manager |
Attachment
I: Annual
Review Of The City’s Plan For Homeless Services
Attachment
II: Action Plan To Address Homelessness
In
Attachment III:
What’s Underway? Action Plan to Address Homelessness
ATTACHMENT I
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE CITY’S
PLAN FOR HOMELESS SERVICES
Public Safety Initiative
In 1994, the City Council adopted the Public
Safety Initiative (now Municipal Code Sections 2.69.010 through 2.69.030)
calling for the City to adopt a plan for homeless services. The City’s plan
required by the Public Safety Initiative is incorporated into the City’s FY
2007-10 Community Development Plan and in the Consolidated Plan for FY 2005 -10
required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
The Public Safety Initiative also requires the City Council to conduct an annual review of the City’s progress in meeting the goals established by the Initiative, and hold a public hearing to assess the effectiveness of the City’s plan. Notice of a public hearing for February 26, 2008, was placed in the Santa Monica Daily Press, www.surfsantamonica.com, and posted on the City’s website.
Effectiveness of the Service Delivery System
The City of
In FY 2006-07 the City funded seven core
homeless agencies:
In addition to the seven core homeless
agencies, the City provides funding to the Westside Food Bank, Common Ground,
As a condition of receiving City funding,
these agencies develop Grantee Program Plans that specify services to be
provided to assist homeless individuals in obtaining greater self-sufficiency
and housing stability. City staff
monitors the delivery of services and client progress through site visits and
the regular review of reports including program outcomes. The seven core
agencies use ClientTrack, the City’s computerized case management system which
tracks clients’ progress at the individual, program and aggregate levels;
monitors unnecessary duplication of services; measures the unduplicated number
of persons served; and tracks outcomes across programs to determine aggregate
benchmarks of self-sufficiency, e.g., permanent housing and employment
placements.
FY 2006-07 Outcomes for the
Continuum of Care
Based on the data in
ClientTrack, results from City-funded programs at the seven core agencies can
be measured and compared over time. In FY 2006-07, a total of 3,097 homeless
persons were provided with case management, temporary housing, addiction
recovery, mental health services, and employment assistance through the
homeless programs funded by the City. Of
those, 2,743 (87%) self-declared themselves to be
Of those who received services in FY 2006-07, over half (61%) were male and 39% were female. Thirty-eight percent (38%) were identified as chronically homeless[2] and 12% were veterans. Through the support of the City-funded services, 772 homeless persons (28%) received emergency or transitional housing, and 344 people (13%) transitioned into permanent housing during the year. In addition, 502 adults (18%) found and maintained jobs leading to self-sufficiency.
Homeless Services Outcomes
FY 2003-04 through FY 2006-07
|
|
FY 2006-07 |
FY 2005-06 |
FY
2004-05 |
FY 2003-04 |
||||
|
|
No. Served |
% Placed |
No. Served |
% Placed |
No. Served |
% Placed |
% Placed |
% Placed |
|
Total
SM-funded Program Participants (A participant is an adult who
self-identifies as a |
2,743 |
N/A |
2,575 |
N/A |
2,248 |
N/A |
2,188 |
N/A |
|
Placements
in permanent housing |
344 |
13% |
352 |
14% |
309 |
14% |
339 |
15% |
|
Placements
in transitional housing |
291 |
11% |
367 |
14% |
342 |
15% |
405 |
19% |
|
Placements
in emergency shelter |
481 |
18% |
384 |
15% |
532 |
24% |
626 | |